Īn Australian demonym for South Australian people is croweater but it does not carry the same idiomatic meaning as eating crow. Įating crow is of a family of idioms having to do with eating and being proven incorrect, such as to " eat dirt" and to "eat your hat" (or shoe), all probably originating from "to eat one's words", which first appears in print in 1571 in one of John Calvin's tracts, on Psalm 62: "God eateth not his words when he hath once spoken". The exact origin of the idiom is unknown, but it probably began with an American story published around 1850 about a dim-witted New York farmer. The crow is a carrion-eater that is presumably repulsive to eat in the same way that being proven wrong might be emotionally hard to swallow. She argued her party was in need of a “major reset”, with fellow MP Stewart McDonald saying the SNP should “embrace the opportunity for a massive shift” brought about by Ms Sturgeon’s departure.Eating crow is a colloquial idiom, used in some English-speaking countries, that means humiliation by admitting having been proven wrong after taking a strong position. She highlighted the attainment gap in education, issues within the NHS, “inadequate proposals” to reform the social care system, the “ferry fiasco”, and the failure to dual the A9 road between central Scotland and the highlands within the timetable set out as being some of the “headaches” Ms Sturgeon’s successor will have to deal with. She said the SNP had “nearly won” the 2014 independence referendum because Scots at the time believed the party to be a “very effective government”.īut she added: “I don’t think that is any longer the case and I think the new leader needs to address that.” Watch my forthright discussion with and about the SNP leadership contenders, how the government needs to change radically, and the future of the independence cause Her comments came as she claimed Ms Sturgeon had “left behind her some major policy headaches for her successor”. “I would be absolutely astonished if there wasn’t a human rights challenge for the impact on women’s rights.” She said: “Even if by some miracle the Scottish Government won the case on the Section 35 order, and remember the British Government only have to show they exercised the power reasonably, the Bill would then be open to a human rights challenge. Mr Yousaf, currently the Scottish Health Secretary, has branded the UK Government’s blocking of the Bill as being an attempt to “undermine the democratic will of the Scottish Parliament”.īut Ms Cherry warned that even if a legal challenge to the UK Government was successful, there could be other courtroom challenges to the legislation. SNP MP Joanna Cherry has been an outspoken critic of the Scottish Government’s gender recognition reforms(Lesley Martin/PA) Humza Yousaf, one of three candidates vying to become the next SNP leader, has made clear he would challenge the Section 35 order which the UK Government used to veto the Bill – but the two other leadership hopefuls, Kate Forbes and Ash Regan, are both opposed to the legislation. She spoke out on an online event looking at the future of the SNP and Scotland after Ms Sturgeon’s resignation – with gender recognition reform having already become a dividing line in the leadership battle. With Westminster also having blocked the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill, Ms Cherry – a lawyer as well as an SNP MP – made clear that even if a legal challenge to this from the Scottish Government was “by some miracle” successful, the legislation could still face another court challenge. Joanna Cherry KC said Nicola Sturgeon, the outgoing First Minister and SNP leader, had refused to do this – citing this as one of the policy “headaches” Ms Sturgeon has left the party. The new leader of the SNP will have to “eat humble pie” over the Scottish Government’s controversial gender recognition reforms, a leading figure within the party has insisted.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |